Upon reading ‘At The Appetite-Cure’, I
giggled along with Mark Twain in his satirical differentiation between appetite
and starvation. This classic short story withstands the test of time by poking fun
at a universal action of eating. It not only is a commonality of humanity but
also links generations up to and beyond today’s time. In the telling of hunger
on two separate occasions, Twain suggests that we have become removed from our
natural beings so much, that we are devoid of common sense. His work is easily receptive
to the young adult audience, relevant to current issues, and is able to provokes
thought into our perceptions versus their actualities.
The first portion of the story, told by
the patient, indicates to the reader that this piece is not a truthfully a review
of an institution, but actually serves as a satire. Twain is not aiming to put his reader to
sleep with big words or analysis, but rather, his humor is sensed straight off
the bat in the first paragraph when he introduces Hochberghaus. He merely
states its location in Bohemia and then proceeds onward in a long ramble about
Vienna’s beer after the second sentence. This quick switch indicates the
distracted manner in which the patient is writing and therefore, leads the
reader to question his interest and value in writing about the health spa.
Also, within this switch is where Twain first uses, as he does many times
throughout the story, sharp sarcasm when he explains the local’s
‘self-sacrifice’ of beer drinking in comparison to the area’s health spa healing
waters. In the next paragraph he calls his discovery of such a “heaven of
self-sanctifiers” as “a mere passing note of gratitude for blessings received.”
This establishes the lackadaisical and
colloquial manner in which Twain wishes to speak to the reader with. If the
patient’s intent was a formal review, he would have removed the first paragraph
of nonchalant thought. This also directs
readers to pay close attention to his words because they sometimes have more than
just a literal meaning. He persists onward
through his thoughts with an even sharper sarcasm, when describing the close
proximity of health spas and transportation systems with his phrases “you can
stand in Vienna and toss a biscuit into Kaltenleutgeben with a twelve inch gun”
and, “you can go by phenomenally slow trains.” If these statements don’t catch
the reader’s attention then surely the name Haimberger will. Thus, his tone of
voice is especially familiar to the young adults today being that sarcasm is a
fluent feature of the teenage tongue. Twain
formats both sections of the story in this dialectic manner to provide a more
interesting read on what could be considered a philosophical discussion.
The focus on loss of appetite as a disease/crisis
in life can be analyzed on many levels making this piece additionally applicable
to present matters. We can take appetite as in its literal definition of
longing food or we can take it as a way to express simply a yearning for
something in our lives. Not only can we play with the definition of appetite, we
can also expand it to fit a wide range of eating problems. We can narrow the
scope of interest to correlate the story with meal plan entrapments of
University students or broadly expand it into areas such as obesity and dieting
debates. All in all, it is in our incessant regularity of life that we take for
granted what we have and lose sight of common sense. It seems an obvious and
natural statement, “Don't eat until you are hungry,” but is it? Mark Twain
addresses this question as follows:
“As regards his health--and the rest of the
things--the average man is what his environment and his superstitions have made
him; and their function is to make him an ass. He can't add up three or four
new circumstances together and perceive what they mean; it is beyond him. He is
not capable of observing for himself; he has to get everything at second-hand.
If what are miscalled the lower animals were as silly as man is, they would all
perish from the earth in a year.”
This excerpt is not only the main nudge
to Twain’s purpose for writing this story, but it also leaves the reader pondering
the so called ‘complexity’ of our world’s issues. We take into account that it
was not necessary for the patient to travel all the way to Bohemia to be ‘cured’
of an appetite. This is confirmed in the
second portion of the story within the conversation with the professor that the
cure process is ‘quite simple’ only consisting of ‘covert starvation.’ This implies
that the cure was merely common sense and didn’t need to be made so
complicated. Just as we can say the oil
crisis could easily be solved by simply banning the use of oil. This solution
scrutiny can be dually applied to say that problems leave plenty of room to exploit.
The entire Appetite Anstallt operation seems to be simply a way to make profit
and is very real in our world today. Just look at the story of the plastic
water bottle. Soft drink companies realized that there would be a cap of how
much soda they sold and therefore, they fashioned the ‘problem’ of dirty tap
water as a scare tactic. People thought of bottled water just as we might think
of someone trying to sell a container of air.
It now had a problem defined value created purely on the basis of
market.
There is no doubt that Twain’s short
Story is highly applicable and valuable to the world of today. It is not only decidedly
entertaining and relatable to the college student; it also embodies that
college mentality that we can solve our world’s problems. By recognizing
regularity, tearing apart solution convolutions and removing ourselves from economic
exploitations, it’s ‘quite simple’.
No comments:
Post a Comment